
The feminist approach
According
to Sharon Spencer “feminine as applied to literature now a days customarily
indicates the author’s preoccupation
with intimate human relationships concern with emotional aspect of life and
with the dynamics of the psychic realm of
experience.
Feminist also implied a position
stressing the beliefs that women are inadequate. Feminist literature written by
men or women is depicting a search for identity, quest for self and lost
prestige and position of women. Feminist literature highlights the basic
difference between a man and a woman in the changed context of contemporary
life. The growth of women’s self – awareness is a major motif in the feminist
literature.
The projection of female psyche reaches at height in the works of
Virginia Woolf’s Mrs. Dalloway and’ To the light house’. The women writer
allies herself intimately with her female reader through this identification.
Feminist in Indian writing
Feminism in Indian writing involves two questions the creative writing
and the critical approach. It has become common place of literary
interpretation to topic as ‘women characters of Mulkraj Anand’, The Feminine
principles of Raja Rao’s novels, Female protagonist in Anita Desai,
Earlier generation of Indian
novelist in English Couched extra- marital or illicit relationships, the more
recent ones go to the extreme in their enthusiasm.
History of feminist writing
In the first phase of Feminist
t writing, writer imitating the norms and traditions cultivated by the more
writers. The second phase expresses a strong protest against the patriarchal standard
of society. The third phase is a period of self- discovery and self- assertion
for women in the west.
Feminism is not
today view as something limited to a women’s world but something that concern both
woman and men together constitute a human family. The cast factor plays
dominant role is determination of the status of Indian women.
v Formalist approach
The Formalist approach regards a
work of art in isolation from all the external point of reference. It analyses
the work of art as a self- sufficient entity constituted by its parts in their
internal relations. And sets out to judge it solely by criteria intrinsic to
its own mode of being
v Aristotle’s study of the formal
characteristics of a work of Art
The analysis of an
art from occurs in the central portion of Aristotle’s poetics. Aristotle
isolates the species ‘tragedy’ and established its relation to the universal as
imitation of a certain action and effected in purging pity and fear. The
tragic work itself can be
analyzed formally as a self
determining whole made up of parts, the
tragic plot are integrated by the internal relations of ‘ necessity or
probability’. Aristotle’s poetics, classical rhetoric and Renaissance theories
are earlier examples of systematic approaches to literary discourses.
v Art for art’s sake
Certain critics of
early 19th century particularly in Germany expanded upon Kant’s formula
that a work of art exhibits ‘purposiveness without purpose’. As Poe expressed
it ‘the aim of a poem for poem’s sake’. And it constitutes eloctrin ‘Art for artist
sake’. In its extreme form, this doctrine changes into the moral ‘life for
art’s sake’. It has been important in the later development in the systematic
studies. T.S. Eliot’s dictum’ when we are considering poetry we must consider it
primarily as poetry and not another thing’ gained wide approval.
v New criticism As a Healthy
Reaction
New criticism was a healthy
reaction against the older philological, historical and biographical approach
to the literature. It compelled the reader to be close text instead of read its
author. Coleridge traced the formalistic method.
Modern critics given a linguistic
turn to criticism. But the formalist approach has its drawback also because it
only stresses on text and neglect the author and milieu of text.
o
Marxist Approach / sociological Approach
Sociological criticism
begins with the understanding that all literature is an expression of society,
social forces, form and conditions. A Marxist critic typically explained
literature in any historical era. Usually the Marxist critics examine the
relation of a literary product to the actual economic and social reality of its
time and place.
The
Hungarian thinker George Lukas the most widely influential of Marxist Critics,
represents such a flexible view of the role of ideology. Raymond Williams also adopted Marxist
concepts. Most historian and critics believes that literature is related to the
era in which author lived society which is addressed.
v Literature as a social institution
Literature is a social
institution. Language and literary devices are a social creation. Literature
imitates life and life is a social reality. In Marxist view of the economic
basis of social organization, class ideologies and class conflict have
influences the works of many critic.
Study of social background
of an author’s work and the influence of that background on that work present
in ‘The Dickens World’ by Humphy House which gives the readers sociological
criticism. We also find the social scene in Dickens’s novels, Social convention
in Jane Austen’s, the relation between social issues and morality in Thackeray.

Sociological criticism
has a deeper insight into the works of the writers and given understanding of
the time and condition of the writer. So the feminist approach is related with
the solving the problems of women or the mindset of people for the wemen.
No comments:
Post a Comment